![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 740
Casino cash: $14401 ![]() |
![]()
Hi,
Guys, I think your overlooking some key points here. 1/ The North American Cars [E46 M3] have the Cats just below the header, hence they are around 10-12 bhp down as oppossed a Euro car. ie] there rated at 333, as oppossed the infamous 343. Some NA cars have posted gains as large as 15 BHP with Euro headers and Cats, you go figure !!! The Super sprint header will give no more than 8-10 BHP in the real world, if really lucky. 8-10 S/S gain if lucky, plus the 10 BHP that your North American Cousins are down and hey, 20 BHP gain on Headers, Hello. F1 has had good results and success with stepped Headers, but the exhaust scavenge process of a F1 Car, combined with the fact that there are No Cats to impeade the exhaust Gas out flow once its exiting, has more to do with the results than a larger pipe into a larger pipe theory. BMW Motorsport actually make a large bore Header for the S54 engine, which was of course made for LHD only. KK Automobile do a very good Header which I think is around 1350 euro for a engine upto 400 BHP plus. Again these are for left hand drive cars so the steering would be a problem. Why not do a Group Buy of say 5 or more of the KK S54 Header, and I am sure Sven will make a RHD, as this will also give them the pattern from which to be able to sell others. And if your Normally aspirated S54 ever makes more that 420 BHP you can call BMW Motorsport and tell them how its done. http://www.kk-automobile.de/html/kruemmer.html Regards, The Gorilla. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 14,646
Casino cash: $43909 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: warrington
Posts: 5,419
Casino cash: $19783 ![]() |
![]()
My headers are on and its being mapped as I type, I will let you all know the results.
Although mine is a bog standard M3 so Im only expecting 370 max, coupled with my full system and carbon airbox, csl spec except for the cams. But put a standard csl on a dyno and it will not be 360bhp prob 345-350. People do get drawn into peak power talk, A well mapped 345bhp peak will beat a poor mapped 370bhp peak powered car, esp on track. Its all in the mapping. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 6,460
Casino cash: $27763 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Driving it like I nicked it
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,058
Casino cash: $6689 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() Wouldn't we all!
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 740
Casino cash: $14401 ![]() |
![]()
Hi,
I think the CSL is about 355 BHP ish although have made a few changes which may have altered it by 2-3 BHP. Ie AC deleted, etc. The CSL engine in the E30 M3, no cats twin 60mm Exhausts, only one box, running on Motec M880 made 365 BHP on the Dyno and it was pulled back a bit at the top, now 355 ish to give a bit more grunt lower down. Will 1600 pounds worth of Super Sprint S/S give me 10 BHP more, I very much doubt it. Regards, The Gorilla. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
S5 - Full Throttle
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 469
Casino cash: $3876 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 740
Casino cash: $14401 ![]() |
![]()
Hi,
Derek Musch at Musch Motorsport had a S54 almost to full works spec here is a pic of a BMW Motorsport Header. http://www.musch-motorsport.com/projecten.php?id=8 Regards, The Gorilla. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
S5 - Full Throttle
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 469
Casino cash: $3876 ![]() |
![]()
Yeah we know Musch, nice guys, we are working together on a few things actually.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() ![]() |
![]()
Some interesting info from JT and The Gorilla.
John, would my car with cat-back SS system see any benefit from a SS manifold? I would rather keep the cats standard ideally - would this restrict flow and therefore additional power? TVM
__________________
Cha'mone Mother F**ker! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|