09-07-2009, 08:31 PM | #41 |
S3 - On the open road
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Somerset
Posts: 96
Casino cash: $2926 |
|
10-07-2009, 01:31 AM | #42 |
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,434
Casino cash: $13579 |
In my opinion the Z3 reinforcement plates will do bugger all - you are not spreading the load to other parts of the chassis, merely sandwiching the weak ass top shock steel - the failures are in the whole shock tower, not just the mounting points.
|
10-07-2009, 09:08 AM | #43 |
S5 - Full Throttle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 469
Casino cash: $3876 |
I have to say I agree, the top plates will help for sure and it maybe enough (failures are relatively rare) but BMW state the entire suspension tower must be supported or at least tied into the chassis floor to properly 'fix' the issue, that why we did a lot more on the harness bar (it would be dead easy just to run a bar from one side to the other and knock em out for £150).
|
10-07-2009, 08:14 PM | #44 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 740
Casino cash: $14401 |
Hi,
NZ_M3- Interesting statement you make. I have never seen a rear BMW Turret damaged with them fitted but have seen plenty of damaged ones without them. Regards, The Gorilla. |
10-07-2009, 10:12 PM | #45 | |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: warrington
Posts: 5,419
Casino cash: $19783 |
Quote:
I think it will certainly help with the problem as where the shock comes through will no longer split. Was this splitting the only fault with rear coilovers? Although im only running front coilovers it will be interesting to know for future reference. Thanks |
|
11-07-2009, 10:07 AM | #46 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 740
Casino cash: $14401 |
Hi,
Lawsy- accordingly yes, or so I am told. The Rear Turret problem as previously explained in not caused by 'bump' its caused by the 'drop'. In the drop, the weight of force of the rear suspension dropping, that's the complete, wheel, hub, brake/disc, trailing arm, wishbones, and coilover is all transmitted to the two nuts that hold the rear top mount in place. This situation is increased when running shorter suspension than say stock where you encounter rear wheel lift. By inserting the Z3 Plates, or a rear strut bar, you push the load across a larger flat surface rather than the the two small point loads, of the original two nuts. By spreading the down force load, instead of creating a load point, the shell metal does not fatigue. If not running a front strut bar, you should also really run large custome washers plates in steel or alloy on the front struts under the top mount locating nuts, as they, to a lesser degree are incurring the same downward forces. On bump, the top mount itself from underneath speads the load across the turret top. It also helps in spreading load across the turret top into the shell as opposed creating a small load point. Better chassis dynamics and so on. Regards, The 'Real' Gorilla. |
11-07-2009, 02:06 PM | #47 |
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portsmouth/Reading
Posts: 1,292
Casino cash: $9290 |
|
12-07-2009, 09:20 AM | #48 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 14,646
Casino cash: $43909 |
Fitted mine last week
|
12-07-2009, 02:29 PM | #49 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 527
Casino cash: $1272 |
As mine spends much of it's time on the road, I'm going to swap back to std suspension, have the Intrax serviced and brought up to the new spec (if reqd) and then make a decision about staying on std or refitting.
If I do, then those plates or a Thorney set of bars will be going in... |
13-07-2009, 02:09 AM | #50 | |
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,434
Casino cash: $13579 |
Quote:
The Z3 plate is smaller than the actual top mount flat surface, all it does is sandwich something inherently weak with a smaller mount surface - it doesn't affect or change the strength of the surface you are sandwiching (not when it is actually smaller). The load is first taken up by the Rear shock rubber mount - that mount spreads the load to the whole shock tower which is inherently weak to take a full coilover in the first place. I am not saying that it will or won't necessarily develop the failure with the Z3 plate. All I am saying is if you are relying on it as a "fix" ... then you are placing way too much faith in it. You need to properly spread the load to use a full coilover on these cars - period - just look at the ALMS M3 GTRs - that's exactly what they have done. If you don't believe, go grab a piece of tissue and place two pieces of cardboard on either side that is slightly smaller but in about the same shape as the tissue paper - put a bolt through it and pull hard - I bet you the tissue paper will still tear - it does nothing to add strength to the inherently weak part. Now try the same experiment but this time spread the load completely - you'll get a different result. |
|
|
|