30-10-2009, 08:13 PM | #31 |
Driving it like I nicked it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,099
Casino cash: $13060 |
Could always take a look at the speedlines that the Torquespeed car is running?
|
30-10-2009, 09:01 PM | #32 | |
S5 - Full Throttle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 469
Casino cash: $3876 |
Quote:
Front 18/8.5/35 (run with optional 10mm spacer depending on track and conditions) Rear 18/9.5/22 Remember going to wider rim will add weight ( it does make a difference, I can tell how my car drives from Rays to pro Race 1.2's even with same tyres on) Tyre deformation is in part due to wheel width for sure but camber is also a major difference, run max on Dunlops. We even have a set in stock |
|
30-10-2009, 09:16 PM | #33 |
Driving it like I nicked it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,099
Casino cash: $13060 |
I looked at the rays in the offsets I wanted but too much money as I needed at least 6 of them. 9.5 is the best wheel size I think, a set of Rays 9.5 all round with spacers on the rear and 250/640/18 all round would be perfect :D
|
30-10-2009, 10:37 PM | #34 | |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: warrington
Posts: 5,419
Casino cash: $19783 |
Quote:
Running the pro race 1.2 18 x 9 all round, I felt the rear needs spacers. Ive not measured the track, but from eye it looks narrower than the front. Ill measure it to be sure, but im defo running spacers on the rear. with 265 35 18 all round. One thing to consider when talking about offsets, widths etc, saying it wont touch the arch or the strut, the style of the rim has to be taken into consideration, |
|
30-10-2009, 10:54 PM | #35 | ||||
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 14,646
Casino cash: $43909 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
def any rim/tyre combo on same froint and rear rims will need rear spacers to look sensible due to the difference in original offsets |
||||
31-10-2009, 12:53 AM | #36 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
|
I prefer this et...
__________________
Cha'mone Mother F**ker! |
31-10-2009, 01:07 AM | #37 |
Driving it like I nicked it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,099
Casino cash: $13060 |
But pink yeah?
|
31-10-2009, 01:13 AM | #38 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 527
Casino cash: $1272 |
|
31-10-2009, 11:03 AM | #39 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: warrington
Posts: 5,419
Casino cash: $19783 |
|
01-11-2009, 09:51 PM | #40 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 14,646
Casino cash: $43909 |
Summary so far;
Ray TE37 18x10 - 8.6kgs TD Pro Race 1.3 18x19 - 11.75kg Ray TE37 19x9.5 - 9.5kgs BMW CSL 19x9.5 - 11.5kgs So the 18 inch TD rims would be a better fit than the CSL wheels on the front as you could get the offset right and probably miss the wheel arch but they are no weight saving over CSL rims. TE37 19 and 18 inch rims would save between 2 and 2.5 kgs per corner respectively (not unsubstantial) but cost alot more money. Easiest option at first is to try the CSL rear rims on the front i guess to see what difference the extra rubber gives first and this at least means i have the tyres and rims so no need to spend for the test outing. Issue therefore i guess is how to get the CSL rims under the wheel arch which comes down to more neg camber. ANYBODY GOT ONE SPARE REAR CSL RIM FOR SALE |
|
|