CSL Register

Go Back   CSL Register > General > Technical Area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2009, 08:31 PM   #41
kbird
S3 - On the open road
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Somerset
Posts: 96
Casino cash: $2926
kbird
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azrael View Post
So whats the general concensus on this then. I've got intrax and turner bush limiter kit. Seems to be a few different options with plates...?
I have fitted the plates as a precaution, have you asked Anthony/Julian what they think?
kbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 01:31 AM   #42
NZ_M3
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
 
NZ_M3's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,434
Casino cash: $13579
NZ_M3 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

In my opinion the Z3 reinforcement plates will do bugger all - you are not spreading the load to other parts of the chassis, merely sandwiching the weak ass top shock steel - the failures are in the whole shock tower, not just the mounting points.
NZ_M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 09:08 AM   #43
Thorney
S5 - Full Throttle
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 469
Casino cash: $3876
Thorney is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I have to say I agree, the top plates will help for sure and it maybe enough (failures are relatively rare) but BMW state the entire suspension tower must be supported or at least tied into the chassis floor to properly 'fix' the issue, that why we did a lot more on the harness bar (it would be dead easy just to run a bar from one side to the other and knock em out for £150).
Thorney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 08:14 PM   #44
The Gorilla
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 740
Casino cash: $14401
The Gorilla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Hi,

NZ_M3- Interesting statement you make.

I have never seen a rear BMW Turret damaged
with them fitted but have seen plenty of damaged
ones without them.

Regards,

The Gorilla.
The Gorilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 10:12 PM   #45
shane@mbtech
CSL Register Uber-poster!
 
shane@mbtech's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: warrington
Posts: 5,419
Casino cash: $19783
shane@mbtech is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gorilla View Post
Hi,

NZ_M3- Interesting statement you make.

I have never seen a rear BMW Turret damaged
with them fitted but have seen plenty of damaged
ones without them.

Regards,

The Gorilla.
Serious question, are you really a gorilla?

I think it will certainly help with the problem as where the shock comes through will no longer split.

Was this splitting the only fault with rear coilovers?

Although im only running front coilovers it will be interesting to know for future reference.

Thanks
shane@mbtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 10:07 AM   #46
The Gorilla
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 740
Casino cash: $14401
The Gorilla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Hi,

Lawsy- accordingly yes, or so I am told.

The Rear Turret problem as previously explained in
not caused by 'bump' its caused by the 'drop'.

In the drop, the weight of force of the rear suspension
dropping, that's the complete, wheel, hub, brake/disc, trailing arm,
wishbones, and coilover is all transmitted to the two nuts
that hold the rear top mount in place.

This situation is increased when running shorter suspension
than say stock where you encounter rear wheel lift.

By inserting the Z3 Plates, or a rear strut bar, you push
the load across a larger flat surface rather than the the two
small point loads, of the original two nuts.

By spreading the down force load, instead of creating a
load point, the shell metal does not fatigue.

If not running a front strut bar, you should also really run
large custome washers plates in steel or alloy on the front struts
under the top mount locating nuts, as they, to a lesser degree
are incurring the same downward forces.

On bump, the top mount itself from underneath speads
the load across the turret top.

It also helps in spreading load across the turret top into the shell as
opposed creating a small load point.

Better chassis dynamics and so on.

Regards,

The 'Real' Gorilla.
The Gorilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:06 PM   #47
azrael
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
 
azrael's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portsmouth/Reading
Posts: 1,292
Casino cash: $9290
azrael is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbird View Post
I have fitted the plates as a precaution, have you asked Anthony/Julian what they think?
I've ordered the plates as a precaution too, car going back next week to have the suspension re fettled now its settled
azrael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 09:20 AM   #48
shimmy
CSL Register Uber-poster!
 
shimmy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 14,646
Casino cash: $43909
shimmy is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Fitted mine last week
shimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:29 PM   #49
Nords
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 527
Casino cash: $1272
Nords
Default

As mine spends much of it's time on the road, I'm going to swap back to std suspension, have the Intrax serviced and brought up to the new spec (if reqd) and then make a decision about staying on std or refitting.

If I do, then those plates or a Thorney set of bars will be going in...
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2009, 02:09 AM   #50
NZ_M3
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
 
NZ_M3's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,434
Casino cash: $13579
NZ_M3 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gorilla View Post
By inserting the Z3 Plates, or a rear strut bar, you push
the load across a larger flat surface rather than the the two
small point loads, of the original two nuts.
Sorry but I disagree.

The Z3 plate is smaller than the actual top mount flat surface, all it does is sandwich something inherently weak with a smaller mount surface - it doesn't affect or change the strength of the surface you are sandwiching (not when it is actually smaller).

The load is first taken up by the Rear shock rubber mount - that mount spreads the load to the whole shock tower which is inherently weak to take a full coilover in the first place.

I am not saying that it will or won't necessarily develop the failure with the Z3 plate. All I am saying is if you are relying on it as a "fix" ... then you are placing way too much faith in it.

You need to properly spread the load to use a full coilover on these cars - period - just look at the ALMS M3 GTRs - that's exactly what they have done.

If you don't believe, go grab a piece of tissue and place two pieces of cardboard on either side that is slightly smaller but in about the same shape as the tissue paper - put a bolt through it and pull hard - I bet you the tissue paper will still tear - it does nothing to add strength to the inherently weak part. Now try the same experiment but this time spread the load completely - you'll get a different result.
NZ_M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)www.wickedwifi.co.uk