|
Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Casino | vBGarage | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
05-06-2009, 12:35 PM | #1 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 801
Casino cash: $8979 |
Intrax suspension failure
At the Ring last weekend and my mates intrax rear suspension failed
|
05-06-2009, 12:40 PM | #2 |
S4 - Getting the hang of it
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southfields, London
Posts: 121
Casino cash: $675 |
Intrax are the ones that use coils on struts at the rear unlike the standard setup which has the springs separate correct?
This therefore doesn't surprise me given the tower isn't necessarily designed for the extra load - as it would have only been designed to hold a shock, not the cars full weight. My 2 cents. I think others had mentioned their concern over this previously? |
05-06-2009, 01:44 PM | #3 |
S5 - Full Throttle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 370
Casino cash: $4367 |
These failures are quite common - they can only be used if a full weld-in cage has been fitted to the rear top monuts to take the extra loadings. You have to stick with the seprate spring and damper unit if you want to stay standard. Imagine if it had completely pushed through while mid cornering - major shunt!
Iain - was it Nathans? |
05-06-2009, 07:49 PM | #4 |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 801
Casino cash: $8979 |
|
05-06-2009, 03:55 PM | #5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
Casino cash: $ |
Failure
It seems like the suspension did not fail, but the top mounting fork punched through the sheet metal of the car. So the car failed not the suspension. I would weld a small strenghtening plate in the car. Or go back to the original spring position. But then you loose the advantages of the coilover system.
|
05-06-2009, 07:56 PM | #6 | |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 801
Casino cash: $8979 |
Quote:
Original position is best with the lower springs taking the load onto the chassis. Like "thegingerninja" said you need a fully weld cage with strengthening on the turrets for intrax Last edited by TANKSLAPPER; 05-06-2009 at 10:53 PM. |
|
06-06-2009, 03:38 AM | #7 | |
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,434
Casino cash: $13579 |
Quote:
I've said many times ... those Intrax should not be used without a roll cage - a full rear coilover setup on these cars are just plain stupid without a roll cage or related structural inhancement. |
|
07-06-2009, 08:14 PM | #8 | |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,247
Casino cash: $15600 |
Quote:
|
|
09-06-2009, 03:44 AM | #9 |
S5 - Full Throttle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 469
Casino cash: $3876 |
Whilst its not right to say I told you so it does validate an opinion we have mentioned (and been criticised for) over an over again. Glad to hear he was OK. The chassis was not designed for a rear coil over, period.
We have designed this to address the issue should people not want to go for a full cage (the only alernative if you want to run rear coil overs) You cant see from this picture but the brace/harness bar has a top plate that fits over the suspension tower and the suspension bolts to it directly. The lower portion bots directly to the chassis floor. |
24-06-2009, 01:15 AM | #10 | |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 527
Casino cash: $1272 |
Quote:
Also, roughly how much labour (cost) to take the Intrax off and refit the std stuff? Cheers... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|