|
View Poll Results: AP or Performance Friction | |||
AP | 2 | 20.00% | |
PF | 8 | 80.00% | |
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15-10-2009, 10:34 AM | #21 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 14,646
Casino cash: $43909 |
cant comment on Alcons on M3 but my AP discs on the front (two sets) both lasted 1 year, 20k miles and 17 track days
MY PF discs on this year have so far done 5k miles and 13 trackdays but i seriously doubt they will do DOUBLE the AP above (2 years, 40k miles and 34 trackdays) |
15-10-2009, 10:36 AM | #22 |
Driving it like I nicked it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,099
Casino cash: $13060 |
I never got 20k miles out of a set of AP Disks! I am just a hobbyist IDIOT.
|
15-10-2009, 10:51 AM | #23 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 14,646
Casino cash: $43909 |
|
15-10-2009, 12:01 PM | #24 | |
S4 - Getting the hang of it
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Middlesex
Posts: 247
Casino cash: $853 |
Quote:
Don't know if there are any real "problems" with APs and they certainly wouldn't be my basis for not choosing them. But general consensus did say their discs were questionable at best in comparison to others, including OEM CSL discs. Alcons OTOH were a proven solution on my old GT3 and used just as successfully as APs in top flight rally and FIA GT motorsport. Certainly less reported issues compared to APs. Amyway, getting back to the OP question: between APs and PFs, I'd probably choose PFs. |
|
15-10-2009, 04:05 PM | #25 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,247
Casino cash: $15600 |
I haven't seen anyone advertising an Alcon disk for use with an AP calliper set up ?
|
16-10-2009, 12:54 AM | #26 |
S5, Sport On, DSC M-track
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,434
Casino cash: $13579 |
Really? I've always had to undo both bolts to change the pads ... pain in the butt to be honest and almost impossible to do at the track if the brakes are HOTT!!!
|
|
|