CSL Register

CSL Register (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Area (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   CSL engine - advice sought! (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5985)

Matt62 10-01-2011 12:06 AM

CSL engine - advice sought!
 
Hi! Some may know me from other forums, I race an E46 M3 V8 GTR. But I have an E46 M3 road-car. I considered the CSL but opted for an M3 spec'd up instead.

I've done the suspension, brakes etc and now have the bits I need to turn my engine into a CSL engine, I have a genuine CSL airbox, CSL ECU and wiring loom. This will be installed in a few weeks and the ECU re-mapped.

The question for you chaps is should I be looking for CSL cams as well or will a re-mapped and tweaked CSL ECU with standard M3 cams be sufficient to have similar power output ?

I suspect many of you have upgraded your CSL camshafts ? My experience, only in the race cars, is that with very high lift camshafts the bottom-end is severly sacrificed. How have people found upgraded camshafts? Should I just go for this instead perhaps ?

Any thoughts or advice would be much appreciated!

DuncanR 10-01-2011 08:57 AM

Sorry cant help Matt.... new engine under warranty !! Others will be along soon with their fourpennuth !!;)

glendog74 10-01-2011 09:11 AM

There was a rather long and tedious post about this sort of thing some time back :hahaha: :

http://www.cslregister.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5199

The Gorilla 10-01-2011 10:20 AM

Hi,

Are your running the S62 or S65 V8 in the E46 ?

With or without Vanos ?

Std or Higher lift Cams ?

OEM or Stand alone ECU ? Pectel/Motec/ KMS-Pi ~?

Reason for the questions is that if you needed V8
''Power'' for the E46 Race Car then why are you
not following suit with your Road Car if its all
about 'Power' increase ?

A standard V8 will be much easier to live with in a
Road Car than a screaming S54 that falls off high lift
cams at anything under 6,000 rpm.

Especially as the S65 is around the same weight
as the S54 and a little bit shorter.

Further, you already have the knowledge and
know how from the Race V8.

Regards,

The Gorilla.

Matt62 10-01-2011 12:05 PM

Thanks for your thoughts Gorilla.

It's a huge can of worms to stick an S62 in the E46 M3 !

To give you some idea it took us about 4 years to get it right in the race car. The engine in that car produces 570bhp and has had about £15k spent on it + £10k every season or two for an overhaul. It's had all major internal components upgraded.

Also, I'm not wanting that kind of power, even if I wanted 500bhp I would just supercharge the S54.

What I want is the CSL noise above anything else! A bit of extra power would be a benefit, but it's not the main reason. Just wondering if CSL cams would give me any benefit at all, but it's not esssential.

The Gorilla 10-01-2011 01:37 PM

Hi,

Matt62- I think BMW pulled off one of the
biggest Motorsport Illusions of all time with
the V8 M3 GTR ALMS 2000/1 Cars.

The point being that although the 'GTR'
shares the S62 Block, the Mader Mecachrom
in the GTR with its Flat Plane Crank special cams
and so on, let alone internals, Dry Sump etc, is at another
level to where S62/S65 M engines can only
dream and aspire to be.

The Red Bull / Renault V8 owes much to a BMW Block !!!

The Cross Plane Crank of the S62 is not user freindly
to high revs, and although it makes good torque the
S62 base engine at 245 Kg's v the 155 Kgs of the Mader V8
is only part of the story.

Still, CSL, bit more Cam on a road Going S54 is Ok,
but as you say, too agrressive and all your doing is
pushing the 'on' Cam Power band further up the
rev counter.

Not exactly what you want in a road car.

If you can find some cams within budget, then fine,
if not, then for a daily driven road car, I would
leave it as is, and just have the ECU remapped
accordingly.

Regards,

The Gorilla.

Matt62 10-01-2011 01:43 PM

Thanks for the info!! Much appreciated !

I think I'll leave the cams. I suspect BMW upgraded the cams in the CSL to help marketing with the 'max power' figure.

Rutkowski 10-01-2011 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt62 (Post 77500)
Thanks for the info!! Much appreciated !

I think I'll leave the cams. I suspect BMW upgraded the cams in the CSL to help marketing with the 'max power' figure.

Hi Matt, welcome on this side! So you're the one who just bought it from ebay!! :thumbs: Congrats.

CSL engine is optimised for the larger volume of air that's being sucked in so intake and exhaust camshafts are longer duration. 280 in and 272 degrees out. Also, the exhaust valves are optimised too.

The lift remains the same at 11.5mm just the duration is a bit longer. If you're going to go for cams, go for Schrick 288 / 280 but stick with 11.5mm lift or CSL ones. It's worth it IMHO. I am hoping i'll achieve 380bhp with mods i am installing.

By the way - I am buying low milage CSL engine (£1500) right now so maybe just buy a second hand engine?

Good luck!

Matt62 10-01-2011 09:35 PM

Hi Rutkowski. I was hoping you may spot this thread, I remember you've some very specific experience in this area! Thanks very much for posting.

Yup, it was me that nabbed it on eBay! I managed to get him to end the auction very early as no-one had bid at that point.

Good point re the engine, I was thinking about getting a standard S54, just as a back-up engine, bearing in mind this road car will become a race car eventually, for the money they are going at now it's well worth it.

Thanks for your advice on the cams. I think I'll go for a remap and run the car for a bit first, see how it is and what it's producing, then go for those other mods/ CSL engine.

NZ_M3 10-01-2011 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Gorilla (Post 77499)
The Red Bull / Renault V8 owes much to a BMW Block !!!

You sure about this???? In the GP2 perhaps (M62 and S62 based), but I don't think there's actually any commonality in design or hardware between the 2010 Redbull/Renault V8 and the BMW P60 motor or subsequent renditions.

Mecachrom does the assemblies for Renault F1 (a separate company to Renault) but they didn't design this motor, Renault F1 did (from my understanding BMW didn't share any input in this engine either).

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Gorilla (Post 77499)
The Cross Plane Crank of the S62 is not user freindly
to high revs, and although it makes good torque the
S62 base engine at 245 Kg's v the 155 Kgs of the Mader V8
is only part of the story.

Ferrari seems to do okay with Flat Plane Crank in their V8s ... I am of the opinion that it's simply a cost saving exercise on BMW's part to release V8s in cross plane crank. All their motorsport V8s are flat plane crank.


+1 about Rutkowski's post.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)www.wickedwifi.co.uk