CSL Register

CSL Register (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Area (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Rear BBK, do I really need it ? (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12816)

Clubber 18-12-2014 05:11 PM

Rear BBK, do I really need it ?
 
Hey guys,

Since we are on a winter break for track days, I was planning to do a full AP BBK upgrade. Fronts are given but as I understand rear 4 pistons are a little overkill and most people fit them to have a matching set and for looks. Please correct me If I am wrong.
I am sure they are better than stock setup. No question about that BUT seing new M cars even with ceramics running single piston rears made me think. Some race teams are even stating %75 percent of the stopping power is achieved with fronts and some say even more.

What are your opinions ?

P.S. I am running RS29's, SS Lines and SRF Liquid on stock setup atm.

alexk 18-12-2014 07:32 PM

I had AP front/rear BBK before I had to sell it.

I bought only front Brembo BBK and the rear is OEM.
All is ok, I didn't see any issue at the track.
The balance feels right (I do trailbraking).

I am not going to upgrade the rear ones.

Clubber 18-12-2014 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexk (Post 177134)
I had AP front/rear BBK before I had to sell it.

I bought only front Brembo BBK and the rear is OEM.
All is ok, I didn't see any issue at the track.
The balance feels right (I do trailbraking).

I am not going to upgrade the rear ones.

Thanks for your input Alex,

It is very interesting that most of the vendors I get a quote from are strongly pushing me for the new AP Radi-Cal kit. They say it is superior in every way but I much prefer the classic kit for ease of finding parts and proven performance.

shimmy 18-12-2014 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clubber (Post 177137)
Thanks for your input Alex,

It is very interesting that most of the vendors I get a quote from are strongly pushing me for the new AP Radi-Cal kit. They say it is superior in every way but I much prefer the classic kit for ease of finding parts and proven performance.

My kits has been fantastic, best by for the CSL by far

0836whimper 19-12-2014 12:05 PM

Not in my experience.

AP's up front, OEM at back and decent pads all round is a superb combo.

Clubber 20-12-2014 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmy (Post 177140)
My kits has been fantastic, best by for the CSL by far

That seems to be the default choice I understand.
Quote:

Originally Posted by 0836whimper (Post 177148)
Not in my experience.

AP's up front, OEM at back and decent pads all round is a superb combo.

I hope so too although I think I'll put them on each year. This year the fronts and next year the rears, fingers crossed. Unless I win the lotto and go for those new stoptech carbon seramics :)

_Nathan_ 20-12-2014 10:12 AM

I found that the car was more settled under hard braking when I went from just front kit with OEM rears to having the 4 pot rears too, the car seems to dive less, less weight transfer to the front.

CraigMillwardCroft 20-12-2014 10:56 AM

I am looking at doing the rear kit as uprated pads are just over heating, will get Adem to look into why first.

trackm3 20-12-2014 11:11 AM

[quote=CraigMillwardCroft;177167]I am looking at doing the rear kit as uprated pads are just over heating, will get Adem to look into why first.[/QUOT


What uprated pads are you running ? Have you recorded the temps ?

CraigMillwardCroft 20-12-2014 11:14 AM

[quote=trackm3;177168]
Quote:

Originally Posted by CraigMillwardCroft (Post 177167)
I am looking at doing the rear kit as uprated pads are just over heating, will get Adem to look into why first.[/QUOT


What uprated pads are you running ? Have you recorded the temps ?

I think they were pagids ? and are all blistered.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)www.wickedwifi.co.uk