![]() |
Rear BBK, do I really need it ?
Hey guys,
Since we are on a winter break for track days, I was planning to do a full AP BBK upgrade. Fronts are given but as I understand rear 4 pistons are a little overkill and most people fit them to have a matching set and for looks. Please correct me If I am wrong. I am sure they are better than stock setup. No question about that BUT seing new M cars even with ceramics running single piston rears made me think. Some race teams are even stating %75 percent of the stopping power is achieved with fronts and some say even more. What are your opinions ? P.S. I am running RS29's, SS Lines and SRF Liquid on stock setup atm. |
I had AP front/rear BBK before I had to sell it.
I bought only front Brembo BBK and the rear is OEM. All is ok, I didn't see any issue at the track. The balance feels right (I do trailbraking). I am not going to upgrade the rear ones. |
Quote:
It is very interesting that most of the vendors I get a quote from are strongly pushing me for the new AP Radi-Cal kit. They say it is superior in every way but I much prefer the classic kit for ease of finding parts and proven performance. |
Quote:
|
Not in my experience.
AP's up front, OEM at back and decent pads all round is a superb combo. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I found that the car was more settled under hard braking when I went from just front kit with OEM rears to having the 4 pot rears too, the car seems to dive less, less weight transfer to the front.
|
I am looking at doing the rear kit as uprated pads are just over heating, will get Adem to look into why first.
|
[quote=CraigMillwardCroft;177167]I am looking at doing the rear kit as uprated pads are just over heating, will get Adem to look into why first.[/QUOT
What uprated pads are you running ? Have you recorded the temps ? |
[quote=trackm3;177168]
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)www.wickedwifi.co.uk