CSL Register

CSL Register (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Area (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Water pump pulley (http://www.cslregister.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11706)

adem.csl 03-02-2014 10:53 PM

Water pump pulley
 
1 Attachment(s)
I don't know if this is of any interest but euros do a smaller water pump pulley his could pump water round the system faster!!! Every little helps
Attachment 9843

Steve B 04-02-2014 10:05 AM

Bigger the pulley the slower it turns so wouldn't this do the opposite??, or is my science GCSE not as good as I thought lol

shane@mbtech 04-02-2014 01:22 PM

It might make it seem quicker too :blalalala:

shimmy 04-02-2014 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawsy (Post 163347)
It might make it seem quicker too :blalalala:

cnut

adem.csl 04-02-2014 09:02 PM

Sorry wrote larger meant smaller my bad!!
Won't make the car faster though lol

alexk 05-02-2014 05:40 AM

Can we find out the difference in the diameter ?

adem.csl 05-02-2014 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexk (Post 163394)
Can we find out the difference in the diameter ?

12cm and 13.3cm

alexk 10-02-2014 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adem.csl (Post 163424)
12cm and 13.3cm

So 37.69cm circumference vs 41.78cm.

Therefore -> 10% higher rpm on the water pump which means 10% increased water flow.

It sounds good.
I am not very happy with the way they look though.
Is this how they really are (photos) ?

shimmy 10-02-2014 07:39 PM

Will the water pump be capable of surviving 10% highe from than it's supposed to run?

uncle benz 10-02-2014 08:29 PM

Show me some science that says rushing water through a radiator faster is better.

shimmy 10-02-2014 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uncle benz (Post 163712)
Show me some science that says rushing water through a radiator faster is better.

i also was wondering

i suppose a bigger rad may mean the water has same time to cool then faster flow may nean extra cooling.

if the water is gettting less time to cool then benefit is questionable

shane@mbtech 10-02-2014 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmy (Post 163714)
i also was wondering

i suppose a bigger rad may mean the water has same time to cool then faster flow may nean extra cooling.

if the water is gettting less time to cool then benefit is questionable

Bigger cooler is more surface area.

Think of electric shower, put on full speed, warm water. Put on low speed, hot.

Think of rad as a reverse of this.

uncle benz 10-02-2014 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawsy (Post 163715)
Bigger cooler is more surface area.

Think of electric shower, put on full speed, warm water. Put on low speed, hot.

Think of rad as a reverse of this.

Now I'm even more confused. The reverse of that you say...

So is that slow speed = warm, fast speed =hot

Or full speed = cool, low speed = cold.

To my mind there must be an optimum speed of coolant flow for a given size of radiator. Surely too slow will mean the coolant is cooled A LOT in the radiator, at the detriment of the coolant left in the engine which will peak much higher.
Too fast and it won't be cooled sufficiently by the radiator before being pushed back into the engine?
Where is the Gorilla when you need him???

adem.csl 10-02-2014 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexk (Post 163708)
So 37.69cm circumference vs 41.78cm.

Therefore -> 10% higher rpm on the water pump which means 10% increased water flow.

It sounds good.
I am not very happy with the way they look though.
Is this how they really are (photos) ?

What???? If one has a 12cm outer diameter and one has a 13.3cm diameter where did you get 37.69 and 41.78?
The pic is at the first post

I didn't say it would definitely work i was questioning would it make an improvement????

shimmy 10-02-2014 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adem.csl (Post 163724)
What???? If one has a 12cm outer diameter and one has a 13.3cm diameter where did you get 37.69 and 41.78?
The pic is at the first post

I didn't say it would definitely work i was questioning would it make an improvement????

Alex was talking about circumference Adem, the distance around the edge. You'd quote diameter which is straight across the pulley.

Iirc circumference = 2x pie x diameter/2 = 2 x 3.142 x 12/2= 37.69 (I'm exhausted now)

shane@mbtech 10-02-2014 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uncle benz (Post 163721)
Now I'm even more confused. The reverse of that you say...

So is that slow speed = warm, fast speed =hot

Or full speed = cool, low speed = cold.

To my mind there must be an optimum speed of coolant flow for a given size of radiator. Surely too slow will mean the coolant is cooled A LOT in the radiator, at the detriment of the coolant left in the engine which will peak much higher.
Too fast and it won't be cooled sufficiently by the radiator before being pushed back into the engine?
Where is the Gorilla when you need him???


It was more in response to shimmys quote about the time the coolant is in the radiator for.

If it's pushed through quicker then it's less likely to cool. That's why I likened it to electric shower, but opposite way round.

uncle benz 10-02-2014 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawsy (Post 163729)
It was more in response to shimmys quote about the time the coolant is in the radiator for.

If it's pushed through quicker then it's less likely to cool. That's why I likened it to electric shower, but opposite way round.

Ahh, I get it now!

A bigger radiator has to be a better bet than messing with pulley sizes.

shimmy 10-02-2014 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawsy (Post 163729)
It was more in response to shimmys quote about the time the coolant is in the radiator for.

If it's pushed through quicker then it's less likely to cool. That's why I likened it to electric shower, but opposite way round.

Yes, and I was saying (badly) that a bigger rad then will allow the water to cool more as it will stay in the rad longer even though it is flowing faster.

Mike R 11-02-2014 08:33 AM

Given how easy it is to reverse this, it should be very easy to test. Access the water temp menu so it is displayed in specific figures and carry out some measurements at a track day (noting ambient temp / barometric pressure changes through-out the day) and then repeat with the other pulley (even better if you can do this on the same day).

adem.csl 11-02-2014 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmy (Post 163726)
Alex was talking about circumference Adem, the distance around the edge. You'd quote diameter which is straight across the pulley.

Iirc circumference = 2x pie x diameter/2 = 2 x 3.142 x 12/2= 37.69 (I'm exhausted now)

Wicked cool im a monkey not a mathematician lol!
Thanks shimmy

shimmy 11-02-2014 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adem.csl (Post 163748)
Wicked cool im a monkey not a mathematician lol!
Thanks shimmy

I had to get my daughter to explain to me first :-D

_Nathan_ 11-02-2014 10:12 PM

I fitted underdrive pulleys to slow down the water pump (and alternator) and extend the life of those parts, wouldn't want either running faster!

alexk 12-02-2014 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Nathan_ (Post 163763)
I fitted underdrive pulleys to slow down the water pump (and alternator) and extend the life of those parts, wouldn't want either running faster!

Nathan is it not causing an issue to the cooling ? Slowing down the water pump ?

_Nathan_ 12-02-2014 04:54 PM

Doesn't seem to be the case.

I actually wonder if the high speed of the water pump is causing cavitation at high RPM running on track?

shimmy 12-02-2014 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Nathan_ (Post 163786)
Doesn't seem to be the case.

I actually wonder if the high speed of the water pump is causing cavitation at high RPM running on track?

I had underdrive pulleys for a while, cant remember when but will check data and see if had overheating problems still with them in (def no problems at normal speeds or stopped)!!

alexk 12-02-2014 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Nathan_ (Post 163786)
Doesn't seem to be the case.

I actually wonder if the high speed of the water pump is causing cavitation at high RPM running on track?

Very interesting.

shane@mbtech 12-02-2014 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Nathan_ (Post 163786)
Doesn't seem to be the case.

I actually wonder if the high speed of the water pump is causing cavitation at high RPM running on track?

Another possible contributory factor maybe.

alexk 12-02-2014 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawsy (Post 163806)
Another possible contributory factor maybe.

Very true, because as soon as you back off, the water temp drops immediately.

shimmy 12-02-2014 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexk (Post 163813)
Very true, because as soon as you back off, the water temp drops immediately.

Not convinced

My feeling is it is throttle related, not revs. I can be at full throttle but not full revs when the temps start to move

If it was water cavitation it would be caused when car runs at max revs, not max throttle/fueling

shane@mbtech 12-02-2014 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmy (Post 163814)
Not convinced

My feeling is it is throttle related, not revs. I can be at full throttle but not full revs when the temps start to move

If it was water cavitation it would be caused ephedra car runs at max revs, not max throttle/fueling

Is it that instantaneous?

shimmy 12-02-2014 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawsy (Post 163816)
Is it that instantaneous?

It has to be hot and car heat soaked, oil then water temps finally rise when you are 100% throttle then within one or two corners they will drop until next time

It would be interesting to see if this is caused also when you run 100% throttle in another gear for a period (when air speed is lower)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c)www.wickedwifi.co.uk