PDA

View Full Version : Couple of pics of the toys


GT TWO
03-11-2008, 01:55 PM
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn145/GTTwo/IMG_0284.jpg

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn145/GTTwo/IMG_0285.jpg

apart from the really bad rain on Sat evening the driving has been good this weekend :thumbs:

cslbecks
03-11-2008, 01:59 PM
Thats a nice stable of horses there matey!!! When is your first track day in the CSL?? Will you be able to make the Evolve dyno day??

RichW
03-11-2008, 01:59 PM
Looking good!



:thumbs:

GT TWO
03-11-2008, 02:52 PM
Thats a nice stable of horses there matey!!! When is your first track day in the CSL?? Will you be able to make the Evolve dyno day??

Thanks, I am at Brands on Wednesday however booked with the GT2.... buuuut I need new rear tyres on it and have not got the time so It looks like I will take the CSL :-D

I think I will make the Evolve day but probably will take the porker as I want to know how much power I am running after the little sofware revision :whistle:

Cheers guys!

cslbecks
03-11-2008, 05:17 PM
Great - hope to see you at Evolve then matey.

M3CSLIRL
03-11-2008, 09:41 PM
Dream :drool:

Andyk
04-11-2008, 07:06 AM
Very nice...go one then which one do you prefer :whistle:

GT TWO
04-11-2008, 09:00 AM
Very nice...go one then which one do you prefer :whistle:

Hello Andy,

I keep getting asked this and its not completely straight forward. Bare in mind I have only been driving the CSL a few days.

CSL

Awesome car, great handling, brilliant all rounder. It can be driven in a very relaxed manor but also like a track car. Very exhilarating with a noise which is second to none. Looks great but not too different to attract unwanted attention. Very modern and easy to live with but also feels bloody quick and rewarding to drive. Does everything well and would be so hard to replace.

GT2

I had gotten used to using the GT2 everyday come rain or shine so I think I had come to find its ride and performance the norm. I got in it on Sunday night after not driving it for days and BLOODY HELL. Its a razor edged ballistic tool that feels more like a race car (needs a cage to finish it off :-D) but on the other had its very harsh and unforgiving in comparison to the CSL, also only 2 seats, fairly basic and old fashioned in comparison... no traction control and with 550ish BHP and boost that kicks you up the arse can be a real handful to drive but also when you get it right a pinpoint weapon of destruction!

So which do I prefer?

I love them both, the CSL is a much better all rounder and does not 'feel' that much slower (i think this is due to the noise) but it is as I have played with CSL's while in the GT2. The CSL does everything so well and I am totally smitten where as the GT2 is a mentalist tool to be used when you feel like a bit of fun.... on a dry day, when no police are about, and you want to live on the edge.

The CSL is like my wife.... beautiful and reasuring, faithful and wont let you down. Fun and the perfect woman to grow old with.

The GT2 is the dirty georgeous woman you have a fling with that blows your socks off(literally :119:) but your never going to spend everyday with her... just the odd weekend :whistle:


ETA: I hope the misses does not find this.

dave1
04-11-2008, 10:01 AM
nice comparison :thumbs:

i logged on in a thai bar once and posted that i was in a bar surrounded by beautiful woman the missus saw it and went mental!!

GT TWO
04-11-2008, 10:42 AM
nice comparison :thumbs:

i logged on in a thai bar once and posted that i was in a bar surrounded by beautiful woman the missus saw it and went mental!!

Ouch that makes me cringe.

Did you skillfully manouver you way out of it?

Andyk
04-11-2008, 10:59 AM
Like it :-D The GT2 certainly has a bit of a reputation....where as you always hope your wife hasn't.

dave1
04-11-2008, 11:21 AM
nice comparison :thumbs:

i logged on in a thai bar once and posted that i was in a bar surrounded by beautiful woman the missus saw it and went mental!!

Ouch that makes me cringe.

Did you skillfully manouver you way out of it?

yes mate i was talking to a guy of the mlr (evo owners club) he was importing a car for me at the time,so i said it was lads banter and that i was bigging up my holiday to wind him up! lol women are so gullible oops better change my password again lol

XPorker
04-11-2008, 07:01 PM
I'll wade in here :-D

Having recently sold the 996 GT2 I had for 18 months and covered some 17K miles in (and kept shiny side up) I'd like to make a few observations.

The GT2 is IMO a massively overated car around which quite a few urban myths have grown up around !

Let me add before I go any further I'm not a track day junkie so all my observations are based on "quickish" road use. I'm no "driving god" either :smokin:

The CSL is a lot more useable and it's performance a lot more accessable.The noise it makes is 5X better than that of the GT2 (standard exhaust)

The GT2 on the right road is a superb weapon, but in my experience the opportunities to use the car on the UKs roads are now few and far between. In short the CSL can be enjoyed more of the time.

Having driven the CSL on some of the best roads in Southern France I'd say the GT2 really would have been found wanting and wouldn't have seen which way the CSL went.
For all the GT2s undoubted power and torque it's a flawed car on anything other than smooth flowing roads. It's power delivery and chassis characteristics are not well balanced for hooning in the manner I enjoy, and to that end both the 996 MK1 GT3 and 997GT3 with their naturally aspirated engines are FAR superior cars (IMO)

Driving through the Gorge du Verdon and up the Col de Turini the CSL with it's longish travel and compliant (compared with the GT2s short travel, and hard) suspension and superb SMG gearbox was peerless
(for those that have driven up and down the Turini you'll know why the SMG box is just soooo good !)

At between £25 -30K the CSL is a performance bargain at the moment IMO. That it's so practical too only adds to its desireability IMO.

If all this sounds like a vendetta against the GT2 it's not, the GT2 is a car that left the factory somewhat hamstrung by the bean counters and thus somewhat underdeveloped when compared with the MK1 GT3 (which was properly honed by the Motorsport division) and the 997 GT3 (which took the whole 911 "game" to a different and far better level)
To that end if you've driven a 997 GT3 and 996 GT2 back to back you'll see just how wanting the old cars chassis dynamics are :119:
The GT2 has it's place, it's ballistically quick on fast flowing roads and will leave even quickish bikers scratching their heads ! But the majority of the time I found its suspension just too flawed to make it a really good point to point cross country car.

In time I'm sure values of the GT2 will start to creep upwards, and in ten years they'll be seen for what they are (the last electronically unfettered GT car Porsche built) rather like the 964 RS. Quite where the CSL will be value wise remains to be seen. . . .

:thumbs:

GT TWO
04-11-2008, 07:40 PM
I'll wade in here :-D

Having recently sold the 996 GT2 I had for 18 months and covered some 17K miles in (and kept shiny side up) I'd like to make a few observations.

The GT2 is IMO a massively overated car around which quite a few urban myths have grown up around !

Let me add before I go any further I'm not a track day junkie so all my observations are based on "quickish" road use. I'm no "driving god" either :smokin:

The CSL is a lot more useable and it's performance a lot more accessable.The noise it makes is 5X better than that of the GT2 (standard exhaust)

The GT2 on the right road is a superb weapon, but in my experience the opportunities to use the car on the UKs roads are now few and far between. In short the CSL can be enjoyed more of the time.

Having driven the CSL on some of the best roads in Southern France I'd say the GT2 really would have been found wanting and wouldn't have seen which way the CSL went.
For all the GT2s undoubted power and torque it's a flawed car on anything other than smooth flowing roads. It's power delivery and chassis characteristics are not well balanced for hooning in the manner I enjoy, and to that end both the 996 MK1 GT3 and 997GT3 with their naturally aspirated engines are FAR superior cars (IMO)

Driving through the Gorge du Verdon and up the Col de Turini the CSL with it's longish travel and compliant (compared with the GT2s short travel, and hard) suspension and superb SMG gearbox was peerless
(for those that have driven up and down the Turini you'll know why the SMG box is just soooo good !)

At between £25 -30K the CSL is a performance bargain at the moment IMO. That it's so practical too only adds to its desireability IMO.

If all this sounds like a vendetta against the GT2 it's not, the GT2 is a car that left the factory somewhat hamstrung by the bean counters and thus somewhat underdeveloped when compared with the MK1 GT3 (which was properly honed by the Motorsport division) and the 997 GT3 (which took the whole 911 "game" to a different and far better level)
To that end if you've driven a 997 GT3 and 996 GT2 back to back you'll see just how wanting the old cars chassis dynamics are :119:
The GT2 has it's place, it's ballistically quick on fast flowing roads and will leave even quickish bikers scratching their heads ! But the majority of the time I found its suspension just too flawed to make it a really good point to point cross country car.

In time I'm sure values of the GT2 will start to creep upwards, and in ten years they'll be seen for what they are (the last electronically unfettered GT car Porsche built) rather like the 964 RS. Quite where the CSL will be value wise remains to be seen. . . .

:thumbs:

'Pretty much' spot on with my thoughts Xporker.

Did you have your GT2 geo'd?

In contrast to you I do track days and this is where the GT2 comes into its own. You can also drive it quick on 'good' UK roads if set up correctly. It is a very adjustable car and as you say its 'hampered' in its OEM form.

Not a lot can touch it for straight line speed but as I said earlier its far more unforgiving than the CSL.

I have driven extensively the 997 GT3 and RS and if a 996 GT2 is setup correctly they will handle very similarly but the GT2 has more power.

The 996 is let down by its interior compared to the 997 but thats evolution.

As for the sound, there is not much to compare with a CSL sound IMO. A Gallardo with tubi has to be up there as does a Carrera GT.

Thats why I have a tubi :whistle:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c94tZTF0D7Y

a pal helped make this video

dave1
04-11-2008, 07:44 PM
quality vid :thumbs:

karbonkid
04-11-2008, 08:11 PM
What a fleet of sick cars! Love the GT2 plate. Mad1!

XPorker
04-11-2008, 10:39 PM
I'll wade in here :-D

Having recently sold the 996 GT2 I had for 18 months and covered some 17K miles in (and kept shiny side up) I'd like to make a few observations.

The GT2 is IMO a massively overated car around which quite a few urban myths have grown up around !

Let me add before I go any further I'm not a track day junkie so all my observations are based on "quickish" road use. I'm no "driving god" either :smokin:

The CSL is a lot more useable and it's performance a lot more accessable.The noise it makes is 5X better than that of the GT2 (standard exhaust)

The GT2 on the right road is a superb weapon, but in my experience the opportunities to use the car on the UKs roads are now few and far between. In short the CSL can be enjoyed more of the time.

Having driven the CSL on some of the best roads in Southern France I'd say the GT2 really would have been found wanting and wouldn't have seen which way the CSL went.
For all the GT2s undoubted power and torque it's a flawed car on anything other than smooth flowing roads. It's power delivery and chassis characteristics are not well balanced for hooning in the manner I enjoy, and to that end both the 996 MK1 GT3 and 997GT3 with their naturally aspirated engines are FAR superior cars (IMO)

Driving through the Gorge du Verdon and up the Col de Turini the CSL with it's longish travel and compliant (compared with the GT2s short travel, and hard) suspension and superb SMG gearbox was peerless
(for those that have driven up and down the Turini you'll know why the SMG box is just soooo good !)

At between £25 -30K the CSL is a performance bargain at the moment IMO. That it's so practical too only adds to its desireability IMO.

If all this sounds like a vendetta against the GT2 it's not, the GT2 is a car that left the factory somewhat hamstrung by the bean counters and thus somewhat underdeveloped when compared with the MK1 GT3 (which was properly honed by the Motorsport division) and the 997 GT3 (which took the whole 911 "game" to a different and far better level)
To that end if you've driven a 997 GT3 and 996 GT2 back to back you'll see just how wanting the old cars chassis dynamics are :119:
The GT2 has it's place, it's ballistically quick on fast flowing roads and will leave even quickish bikers scratching their heads ! But the majority of the time I found its suspension just too flawed to make it a really good point to point cross country car.

In time I'm sure values of the GT2 will start to creep upwards, and in ten years they'll be seen for what they are (the last electronically unfettered GT car Porsche built) rather like the 964 RS. Quite where the CSL will be value wise remains to be seen. . . .

:thumbs:

'Pretty much' spot on with my thoughts Xporker.

Did you have your GT2 geo'd?



Now that IS a red rag to a bull !!!! :moan:

But yes I did have it geo'd
(I consider myself the worlds leading authority on GT2 geo now actually) :-D

JZ M*chtech did it twice (after they'd f*cked it up the first time) :smt071 :wanker:

Fearnsport did it twice (an excellent bunch of lads who drastically improved it)

Mike at Sports and Classic further improved it.

Finally Chris Franklin at CG honed it to perfection.

Having finally got it set up properly I rapidly discovered the shortcomings of the standard suspension and its geo settings. :moan:

I've been passengered in a GT2 with Moton Club Sport suspension, it transformed the car (as you'll be aware the standard Bilsteins that Porsche fitted are the cheapest sh*ttiest dampers available. The Motons made the car so much more compliant and planted.
It's so annoying that what was a £120k car (new)was allowed out of development with such useless suspension.

We'll have to agree to differ on the 997 GT3 Vs 996 GT2 handling front. :thumbs:
The 997 GT3 bodyshell has almost forty percent more flexural strength than that of the 996 (and is 8% stiffer torsionally)

Drive a 996 GT2 with standard suspension along an undulating and poorly surfaced (not badly surfaced) road and you'll feel two things.

Firstly the standard dampers and springs are totally at odds with each other (front dampers too stiff, rear dampers too soft) but also that the 996 "platform" (bodyshell) twists torsionally and in flexure.

The problem is that the dampers and springs don't have a sufficiently stable platform to function from.

Drive the same section of road in a 997 GT3 and the "platform" is so much stiffer with no obvious torsional flexing or lack of flexural stiffness. Quite simply the dampers actually control the wheels as opposed to fighting a losing battle with a bodyshell that doesn't provide the stiffness to allow them to function as theywere intended.

IMO the Moton equipped 996 GT2 I passengered in didn't address the inherent issue with the 996 chassis it merely masked it with top quality damping and a vastly better choice of spring and damper rates !

Sound wise the CSL takes some beating. I think it's as near to a DTM car of the late 80s and early nineties as you'll ever get !

Driven back to back the GT2 made the CSL feel like a stunned slug (sorry) driven in isolation however the CSL is more than quick enough.
I just wish someone would have the balls to cast a few 3.8 litre blocks for a 410-420hp NA conversion !! Then I'd stop hankering for another 997 GT3.

http://i35.tinypic.com/25syf12.jpg

:smt060

GT TWO
04-11-2008, 11:03 PM
XPorker, you certainly went to some lengths to get your GT2 how you wanted it.

Chris at Centre of Gravity knows his stuff for sure.

The 997 GT3 is no doubt a better car than the 996 GT2. I wanted a GT2 as I wanted a big power extreme modern Porsche. I used to have a 996tt which was far too soft for my liking so the GT2 was a natural progression.

At this time the GT3RS was too expensive for me but for sure now my next car will be a 997 GT3 or RS as I completely agree that the car is close to Porsche perfection.

I have done nearly 15k in this Porsche and loved every minute of it, but I dont think it is a keeper for me whereas the CSL is.

On the subject of Motons, I have been in several race cars with Moton and if I was going to buy a setup for a track car I would look here first. I had KWv3 on my previous Z3 M Coupe and I thought that they were awesome until I went out in an E30 M3 with a Moton setup.

Incidentally some of the US guys have used the parts of the 997 GT3 suspension to further improve the 996GT2 setup and apparently had great results.

For my level of driving the GT2 is plenty good enough and still puts a very big smile on my face :thumbs:

XPorker
04-11-2008, 11:31 PM
My 996 MK1 GT3 was transformed from a "hedge seeking missile" into a superb and stable fast road car with a properly set up chassis.

It never ceases to amaze me the amount of people who underestimate just how critical geo set up is on any quick car. (That's not aimed at anyone on here !)

It's not like the adjustability isn't built in ! so why not set it up exactly as its makers intended ? The differences a proper geo adjustment made even to my 140,000 mile 330D Sport are just night and day !

Increased corner speeds and extra confidence can cost a fortune in the form of uprated suspension and driver tuition, yet a properly carried out geo, corner weight and ride height adjustment transforms any quick car, increases tyre life, and in the case of the GT2 (with 24 inches of rubber on the rear) dare I say it, increases fuel consumption !
But joking aside my GT2 was running with excessive toe in on the rear. Set to the correct factory settings it felt like it had gained another 30-40 hp with the reduced scrubbing across the rear tyres !!

dave1
05-11-2008, 11:43 PM
my toys not quite as flash but the rush is the same lol!

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/245/dsc00207pt4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
[URL=http://g.imageshack.us/img217/dsc00207pt4.jpg/1/][IMG]http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/dsc00207pt4.jpg/1/w800

glendog74
06-11-2008, 12:23 AM
:thumbs: :beer: :thumbs: