What a Body

[Mark CSL]

:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMV1kYNgfHQ

[Bounce]

:hahaha::hahaha::hahaha::bigcry:

[RolyGTIR]

Thats what you call a Kronenbourg! :hahaha::hahaha:

[cslgirl]

:thumbs:

[shimmy]

this is interesting as i have been chatting to the wifey the past few weeks about certain things :bigcry:

she had bought some combat trousers, that were fitted and looked very young. Now she wears them well and certainly did not look ropey in them BUT i did happen to say that i reckoned women need to look no more than 15 years older from the front than from the back. Now as you can imagine hi had to say it twice then axplain what i meant by which point i wish i had not bothered.

What do you guys and gals think. My take on it is that when you walk or drive by a lady, from the back her clothes, hair and general figure and stance should at least give you an idea of the age range they are in. Otherwise if you get round the front and they are 20 years older the shock can be severe and probably make them less attractive than if they just were a bit frumpy and middle aged

Discuss!

[cslgirl]

I know where you are coming from Shim, but that is probably not the best thing to say to your wife.

If she wears them well and looks good in them (and you think so too), why should she care what some perv thinks as he comes past to have a stare ;)

I think (normal) women know what they can and cannot get away with at their respective ages.

On the other side of it, you could have a slim blonde girl wearing not a lot swishing down the pavement, take look at her from the front and think fecking hell, look at the boat race on that! That's a Jeremy Kyle candidate if I ever saw one. :hahaha:

[cantfind1]

I think I fancy Shimmy's wife!:gayfight:

[Manny_RDS]

this is interesting as i have been chatting to the wifey the past few weeks about certain things :bigcry:

she had bought some combat trousers, that were fitted and looked very young. Now she wears them well and certainly did not look ropey in them BUT i did happen to say that i reckoned women need to look no more than 15 years older from the front than from the back. Now as you can imagine hi had to say it twice then axplain what i meant by which point i wish i had not bothered.

What do you guys and gals think. My take on it is that when you walk or drive by a lady, from the back her clothes, hair and general figure and stance should at least give you an idea of the age range they are in. Otherwise if you get round the front and they are 20 years older the shock can be severe and probably make them less attractive than if they just were a bit frumpy and middle aged

Discuss!

I can cope with that, but the other day in the West End I was walking behind a girl, great figure, lovelly arse, tight jeans, high heels, she had the same haircut as the fit one from the the Saturdays. Then she turned around.

It was a fucking bloke :gayfight:

[shimmy]

It was a fucking bloke :gayfight:

good shag?

[Bounce]

We have one like that down here,her nick name is 1664,16 from the back and 64 from the front.:bigcry::bigcry:

[DuncanR]

We have one like that down here,her nick name is 1664,16 from the back and 64 from the front.:bigcry::bigcry:

pHONE NUMBER P[LEASE !! :whistle:

[Bounce]

pHONE NUMBER P[LEASE !! :whistle:Ill see what i can do Dunc.;)

[whopwop]

You dont need to look at the mantle piece when you are poking the fire :hahaha:

[shane@mbtech]

We have one like that down here,her nick name is 1664,16 from the back and 64 from the front.:bigcry::bigcry:


Doggy styleee only then:thumbs:

[Bounce]

Doggy styleee only then:thumbs:Either that or a double bagger Shane,one over her head and yours,just in case one falls off.;)